Pittsburgh Delayed Diagnosis & Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Free Case Evaluation
Fill out the form below to schedule a free evaluation.
When A Delayed Diagnosis Has Tragic Consequences
At Lupetin & Unatin, we’ve spent decades fighting for patients who were told ‘you’re fine’ and weren’t. We’ve handled, settled, or tried to verdict pretty much every delay in diagnosis. If a doctor missed your cancer, dismissed your symptoms, or ignored a test result that could have changed everything, Pennsylvania law may entitle you to compensation.
Do I Have a Medical Malpractice Case?
Proving medical malpractice related to a diagnostic error requires more than showing that a doctor was wrong; we must prove they were negligent. There are four requirements for proving medical malpractice in Pennsylvania: Duty of care, Breach of the standard of care, causation, and measurable damages.Our Pittsburgh-based law firm specializes in navigating complex MCARE requirements and the new venue rules to hold negligent providers accountable.
Requirements for a Medical Malpractice Claim
- Duty of Care: a Doctor-Patient Relationship: You were under the care of the provider or facility (e.g., UPMC, AHN, or a private clinic).
- Breach of Standard: The provider ignored a “red flag” symptom or failed to order a standard test that a competent peer would have.
- Increased Risk of Harm: The delay directly worsened your prognosis or removed a “window of opportunity” for treatment.
- Measurable Damages: The error led to additional medical costs, lost wages, permanent disability, or wrongful death.
Diagnostic “Red Flags” Checklist
- Dismissed Symptoms: You complained of specific pain (chest, neurological, or a lump) that was dismissed as anxiety or “nothing to worry about.”
- The Silent Result: A test was performed, but you were never notified of a “positive” or “concerning” finding.
- The Second Opinion: A second doctor diagnosed your condition immediately using the same information the first doctor had.
- The Facility Error: A hospital or lab lost samples, mislabeled results, or failed to perform an ordered scan.
Commonly Missed Diagnoses
Delayed Diagnosis of Cancer
Malpractice typically occurs when a provider ignores “red flag” symptoms or misinterprets critical tests—such as a radiologist misreading a suspicious mass as a benign cyst or a pathologist failing to identify malignant cells in a biopsy. In Pennsylvania, these errors are actionable if the delay caused an “Increased Risk of Harm.” This means the doctor’s negligence effectively removed your window for less invasive treatment, significantly reduced your survival rate, or allowed a treatable Stage 1 cancer to progress to incurable Stage 4.
Pediatric Delays
Malpractice occurs when a provider dismisses a child’s deteriorating condition—such as meningitis, appendicitis, or a congenital heart defect—as a routine viral infection or “growing pains.” In Pennsylvania, these cases are unique because the law provides an extended timeline for minors to file a claim. We focus on proving that the failure to listen to parental concerns or perform age-appropriate testing deprived the child of a critical recovery window, often leading to lifelong developmental or physical challenges.
Cardiac Events
Malpractice typically involves a provider dismissing classic “red flag” symptoms, such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or sudden neurological deficits – as less urgent issues like acid reflux or a simple headache. Whether it is a failure to order a STAT EKG, a misread CT scan, or a delay in administering clot-busting medications, these oversights can lead to irreversible heart muscle damage or permanent brain injury. In Pennsylvania, we focus on proving that timely intervention would have significantly altered the outcome, preventing the catastrophic results of an untreated cardiac event.
Sepsis & Septic Shock
Malpractice typically involves a failure to recognize the “SIRS” criteria—such as high heart rate, abnormal temperature, or low blood pressure—and a failure to initiate the federally mandated “SEP-1” treatment bundle (fluids and antibiotics). If a hospital ignores these clear warning signs or misdiagnoses a systemic infection as a common flu, they have breached the standard of care. We hold facilities accountable for these high-stakes delays that result in septic shock, limb loss, or wrongful death.
Radiology Errors
Medical malpractice or negligence often involves missing a “positive” finding—like a small fracture, an early-stage tumor, or internal bleeding—that a reasonably competent radiologist would have identified. Whether it is a “perception error” where a finding is missed entirely or an “interpretation error” where a suspicious shadow is dismissed as normal, these failures can lead to catastrophic delays. In Pennsylvania, we prove that this misread scan deprived the patient of a critical window for intervention, leading to an “Increased Risk of Harm” or permanent disability.
Hospital-Acquired Infection
Medical negligence arises when a facility fails to maintain sterile environments, ignores early signs of post-surgical infection, or allows unsafe staffing levels that lead to poor patient oversight. While not every infection is malpractice, a claim is valid if the provider’s deviation from safety standards allowed a manageable infection to escalate into a life-threatening crisis. We investigate medical records to find the specific “safety lapse” that caused your preventable harm.
Pennsylvania Legal Rules & Deadlines
In Pennsylvania, you generally have two years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit. If the error (like a misread X-ray) wasn’t immediately obvious, the two-year clock may not start until you “reasonably” discovered the harm. For children injured by medical errors, the two-year clock typically doesn’t start until their 18th birthday, meaning a claim can often be filed until they turn 20.
Following a landmark Pennsylvania Supreme Court order on February 18, 2026, the expanded venue rules are now the permanent standard for medical malpractice. This is a significant advantage in diagnostic delay cases, which often begin at smaller community clinics or imaging centers.
Strategic Venue Choice: You are no longer forced to sue in the specific county where the misdiagnosis occurred. If the hospital system or diagnostic network (such as UPMC or AHN) “regularly conducts business” in Pittsburgh, our firm can often file your case in Allegheny County. This allows us to seek justice in a venue experienced with complex medical litigation and the catastrophic long-term damages often associated with a missed cancer or stroke diagnosis.
Pennsylvania’s Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act ensures there is a fund to pay for large settlements.
Layered Coverage: Doctors in PA carry a primary insurance policy, but the MCARE Fund provides an additional layer of mandatory “excess” coverage.
Impact on You: This system ensures that even in catastrophic cases with multi-million dollar damages, there is a stable fund available to pay your verdict or settlement.
Within 60 days of filing your lawsuit, Pennsylvania law requires a “Certificate of Merit.” This is a signed statement from your attorney confirming that a qualified medical expert has reviewed your records and believes the care you received fell below professional standards. Without this, your case cannot proceed.
Case Study
This is the story of how Lupetin & Unatin, LLC stepped in to demand justice for a patient and her husband, uncovering a web of negligence and systemic failure through aggressive litigation – and securing devastating admissions from both the physician and her nurse that they had failed to meet the medical standard of care.
Article
HELLP Syndrome is a rapidly progressing, life-threatening pregnancy complication that damages blood cells and the liver. When doctors dismiss symptoms like abdominal pain and severe headaches as “normal pregnancy complaints,” the window for life-saving delivery can close.
Article
Case Study
The “first or worst” headache of a patient’s life is a critical medical red flag that demands immediate investigation. When emergency room doctors dismiss severe symptoms as mere migraines without ordering proper imaging, the results can be fatal. Lupetin & Unatin represented the family of a 28-year-old woman whose undiagnosed brain clot led to a tragic death. Discover how our attorneys hold providers accountable for diagnostic failures.
Article
Article
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition that occurs when a blood clot, usually from the deep veins of the legs or pelvis, travels to the lungs and blocks a pulmonary artery. Unfortunately, PE is often misdiagnosed or not treated in time, making it a leading cause of preventable death in the United States.
Diagnostic Delay or Error Case Results
A Pennsylvania vascular surgeon negligently delayed surgical treatment of a man suffering from critical limb ischemia. Due to the negligent delay, the man suffered an above the knee amputation. The original offer before trial was $125,000. This was one of the largest verdicts in the history of Indiana County, Pennsylvania. This case was worked up by Greg Unatin, and tried to verdict by Greg Unatin, Brendan Lupetin, and Garrett Trettel.
Our client was a 52-year-old man left paralyzed and with constant, severe neurologic pain due to the delayed diagnosis of a spinal epidural abscess and spinal cord compression. The patient presented to the emergency department of a rural Western Pennsylvania hospital where a CT scan showed worrisome findings involving his thoracic spine. The patient was transferred to a different hospital where he developed progressively worsening back pain, weakness, and sensory changes in his legs. No imaging of the spine was performed for almost two-days while the patient’s neurologic function deteriorated. By the time an MRI was completed and doctors discovered the epidural abscess, the patient had developed irreversible injury from compression of his spinal cord. Our client was left unable to move his legs and with frequent, painful spasms in his lower body due to the destruction of his spinal nerves and nerve roots. Unfortunately, the patient lost his ability to live independently and was dependent for nearly all activities of daily living.
Our firm recently resolved a tragic case involving the wrongful death of a 47-year-old man whose abdominal cancer was mismanaged over a 15-month period. Despite clear indications of malignancy, his medical providers failed to recommend timely diagnostic tests or appropriate treatment. As a result, the mass grew exponentially, causing severe complications and ultimately leading to his death. This negligence deprived a loving husband and father of four daughters of his life. After vigorous litigation, our firm secured a $2.7 million settlement for his family, providing financial security and holding the negligent parties accountable.
Our firm secured a $2.0 million settlement on behalf of the family of a forty-year-old man who presented to the emergency department of a local hospital four-times over five-weeks with complaints of persistent headaches, nausea, vomiting, and fever. Based on his history, symptoms and lab results, the patient should have received the gold-standard test to diagnose meningitis. Instead, the patient was repeatedly diagnosed and treated for migraines despite never having migraines in the past. The patient was eventually admitted to the hospital with worsening symptoms, but his attending neurologist did not order a lumbar puncture until the man developed seizures and became non-responsive. Unfortunately, his untreated brain infection led to increased intracranial pressure and irreversible brain injury resulting in death.
Our firm secured a $2 million settlement for an elderly man who suffered permanent quadriplegia due to delayed diagnosis and treatment of a spinal cord injury. Despite presenting to the emergency department with clear symptoms of spinal trauma, including pain, weakness, and neurological deficits, healthcare providers failed to promptly diagnose a cervical spine fracture and epidural hematoma. This delay in care resulted in the progression of the injury, leading to irreversible spinal cord compression and paralysis. Through vigorous litigation, we obtained justice for our client, holding the responsible parties accountable and providing the resources needed for his long-term care and support.
Our firm secured a $2 million settlement for a woman whose endometrial cancer diagnosis was significantly delayed due to medical negligence. Despite presenting with symptoms of post-menopausal bleeding and a family history of uterine cancer, her physician failed to obtain an adequate biopsy sample and did not communicate the inconclusive results. As a result, the cancer progressed to Stage III before being diagnosed, requiring aggressive treatment and drastically reducing her life expectancy. This settlement provides financial support for the client’s extensive medical care and serves as a reminder of the critical importance of timely and thorough medical evaluation.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. A “misdiagnosis” is only malpractice if the doctor failed to follow the Standard of Care. If a competent doctor would have made the same choice under the same circumstances, it may not be actionable.
PA law recognizes the “Increased Risk of Harm” standard. If a delay in diagnosis reduced your chances of survival or a better recovery, you can pursue a claim even if a “perfect” outcome was never guaranteed.
We operate on a contingency fee basis. This means we advance all costs for expert witnesses and medical records. You pay nothing unless we win your case.
A misdiagnosis is when a doctor tells you that you have one condition (like acid reflux) when you actually have another (like a heart attack). A delayed diagnosis is when the doctor eventually finds the right condition, but only after an unreasonable amount of time has passed. Legally, both are forms of negligence if the error resulted in an “Increased Risk of Harm” or allowed a treatable condition to become life-threatening.
In many cases, you can sue both. Hospitals in Pennsylvania can be held liable under Corporate Negligence (for systemic failures like poor staffing or failing to have “failsafe” result reporting) or Vicarious Liability (if the doctor was an employee or agent of the hospital). This is a critical distinction because hospital systems often have much larger insurance layers through the MCARE Fund.
This is where the Pennsylvania “Loss of Chance” doctrine is vital. We don’t have to prove that you would have been 100% cured with a faster diagnosis. We only need to prove that the doctor’s negligence took away a meaningful opportunity for a better outcome or made your treatment significantly more painful, invasive, or expensive.
Yes. Pennsylvania follows a “Modified Comparative Negligence” rule. This means that as long as you were not more than 50% responsible for the delay, you can still recover damages. Even if you missed an appointment, if the doctor failed to properly warn you of the urgency or misread a previous test that should have triggered an immediate call, the primary liability often still rests with the provider.