Hospital Negligence Lawyers in Pittsburgh
Free Case Evaluation
Fill out the form below to schedule a free evaluation.
Systemic Failures, Understaffing, and Corporate Negligence
At Lupetin & Unatin, we’ve spent decades taking on massive health systems when their systemic failures cause harm. We’ve handled, settled, or tried to verdict cases involving understaffing and corporate negligence across PA. If a hospital’s administrative errors led to your injury, Pennsylvania law may entitle you to significant compensation.
Do I Have a Medical Malpractice Case?
Hospital negligence is often more than a single doctor’s error; it is a failure of the institution itself. When a hospital system like UPMC or AHN prioritizes profits over patient safety—resulting in dangerous understaffing, negligent hiring, or broken safety protocols—they can be held liable under the “Corporate Negligence” doctrine. In Pennsylvania, hospital liability is governed by the Thompson v. Nason Hospital doctrine. This allows us to sue a hospital directly for failing to ensure your safety through its administrative and operational duties. Whether your injury was caused by a fall, a medication error, or ER “boarding” delays, Pennsylvania law provides a path for recovery.
The Four “Thompson Duties” of a Hospital
- Maintenance of Facilities: A duty to ensure all equipment is working and the environment is safe.
- Selection & Retention: A duty to hire only competent physicians and staff through rigorous “credentialing.”
- Overseeing Patient Care: A duty to monitor everyone practicing medicine within its walls.
- Enforcement of Rules: A duty to formulate and follow safety policies (like fall prevention or infection control).
Hospital Negligence “Red Flags” Checklist
- The “Short-Staffed” Signal: You spent hours pressing a call button for basic needs, or a nurse mentioned they were “covering double the usual patients.”
- ER Boarding: You were left in a hallway or a “holding area” for 24+ hours while your condition deteriorated because no inpatient beds were available.
- Negligent Credentialing: You discovered the doctor who injured you had a history of similar errors or lost their privileges at another local hospital.
- Equipment Failure: A critical monitor was broken, or an alarm was silenced/ignored by a staff that was suffering from “alarm fatigue.”
Common Forms of Systemic Hospital Negligence
Dangerous Understaffing & Fatigue
When a hospital fails to maintain safe nurse-to-patient ratios, basic care falls through the cracks. Malpractice occurs when a fatigued staff member fails to monitor a high-risk patient, resulting in a fall, a missed medication dose, or a failure to recognize a “Code Blue” event. In Pennsylvania, we hold facilities accountable for administrative decisions that sacrifice patient safety for corporate efficiency.
Negligent Hiring & Credentialing
Negligence arises when a hospital grants surgical privileges to a doctor with a known history of substance abuse, multiple prior malpractice settlements, or a lack of proper certification. If a hospital knew (or should have known) that a provider was incompetent but allowed them to continue practicing, the hospital is directly liable for the resulting harm under the doctrine of corporate negligence.
ER Boarding & Bed Management Delays
Malpractice occurs when a patient’s condition (such as a stroke or infection) worsens while they are “boarded” in an area not equipped for long-term care. If a hospital fails to transfer a patient to a facility with an available bed or fails to provide proper monitoring during the wait, they have breached their duty to ensure patient safety.
Medication Administration & System Errors
Negligence involves more than a nurse grabbing the wrong vial; it includes a hospital’s failure to implement “Double-Check” systems or failing to reconcile medications during a patient’s transfer between departments. We investigate the “Bar Code Medication Administration” (BCMA) logs to find where the facility’s safety system failed to prevent a deadly interaction or overdose.
Fall Prevention & Patient Supervision
If a patient is identified as a “High Fall Risk” but the hospital fails to use bed alarms, non-slip socks, or 1:1 supervision, the facility is liable for the resulting hip fractures or brain bleeds. In Pennsylvania, we prove that a fall was not an “accident,” but a direct result of the hospital’s failure to follow its own written fall-prevention policies.
Communication Breakdowns (Handoff Errors)
Malpractice occurs when a hospital lacks a standardized protocol for communicating critical test results or patient allergies between doctors. If a patient is moved from the ER to the ICU and the new team isn’t told about a “STAT” lab result, the delay in treatment is a form of administrative negligence. Our attorneys are dedicated to helping victims uncover these hidden gaps in hospital communication.
Pennsylvania Legal Rules & Deadlines
In Pennsylvania, you generally have two years from the date of the injury to file a claim. For hospital negligence involving administrative errors, the “clock” may start when you first discover that a systemic failure (like a lack of equipment) contributed to your harm.
Corporate Accountability: Since major systems like UPMC and AHN “regularly conduct business” in Pittsburgh, we can permanently file cases against them in Allegheny County, regardless of where the specific facility is located. This allows us to hold large corporate defendants accountable in a venue that understands the true scale of their operations.
In February 2026, the PA Supreme Court clarified that facilities providing care during an involuntary commitment may have broader immunity for “ordinary negligence” related to physical care (like pressure ulcers). However, this immunity does not cover “gross negligence” or “willful misconduct.” Our firm is uniquely positioned to help families navigate these new, stricter 2026 standards for psychiatric hospital care.
Pennsylvania’s Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act ensures there is a fund to pay for large settlements.
Layered Coverage: Doctors in PA carry a primary insurance policy, but the MCARE Fund provides an additional layer of mandatory “excess” coverage.
Impact on You: This system ensures that even in catastrophic cases with multi-million dollar damages, there is a stable fund available to pay your verdict or settlement.
Case Study
This case study details how the medical malpractice attorneys at Lupetin & Unatin, LLC fought to hold hospital and attending physicians accountable in a case where the failure to properly interpret imaging studies and the negligent prescription of a dangerous laxative led to a perforated colon, septic shock, and months of agony and embarrassment.
Article
In many cases, CAUTIs are preventable. When hospitals, nursing homes, or healthcare providers fail to follow proper standards of care for catheter use, the result can be a severe infection, sepsis, prolonged hospitalization, or even death. In these cases, a catheter-associated infection may be a result of medical malpractice.
Article
In the complex environment of a hospital, patient safety is paramount. Yet, a critical concern that often gets overlooked is the issue of patients eloping or wandering from the facility, leading to serious injury or even death. At Lupetin & Unatin, we have seen the devastating outcomes that can arise when a patient is allowed to elope or wander from a hospital or nursing home.
Hospital Negligence Case Results
Our client was Dr. David Irwin, the former Chief of Pain Management at UPMC Hamot. In 2014, Dr. Irwin slipped on snow-covered ice while exiting the UPMC Hamot Surgery Center through a non-public door, which staff were required to use after hours because the main entrances were locked. He suffered severe back and shoulder injuries, developed chronic pain, and was unable to return to his career in medicine.
Brendan Lupetin & Gregory Unatin represented Dr. Irwin and his wife in 2025. After a week-long trial, the jury found UPMC Hamot negligent and returned a unanimous verdict after only two hours of deliberation. The award — including past and future economic losses, non-economic damages, and consortium damages for Dr. Irwin’s wife — is believed to be the largest slip-and-fall verdict in Erie County history, surpassing the prior record of $3.2 million, also won by Lupetin & Unatin.
Our client was a prominent oral surgeon who slipped and fell in an operating room that had recently been wet mopped by janitorial staff. The defendant, St. Vincent Surgery Center, had a policy of not placing wet floor signs while mopping. Two years before our client fell another healthcare worker had slipped, fallen, and been injured under similar circumstances. The Surgery Center vowed to fix the problem by always placing wet floor signs. Unfortunately, the intended change in policy was never communicated to the custodial staff. As a result, they continued to mop the old way by not setting out wet floor signs until after active mopping was completed. Due to his injuries, our client was forced to medically retire at least two years earlier than he had planned. He sustained a significant income loss. We also proved a substantial claim for pain and suffering as well as the loss of ability to do the work he loved.
Brendan Lupetin and Maggie Cooney tried this case together before Judge Erin Connelly Marucci in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County Erie County.
Our client was in his early 30’s when he presented to an emergency department outside of Pittsburgh with signs and symptoms of shock, including weakness and low blood pressure. Lab work confirmed the patient was likely suffering from shock. A chest x-ray showed an enlarged heart and raised concern for a condition called cardiac tamponade. Cardiac tamponade is a life-threatening condition caused when the heart is compressed due to the build-up of fluid inside a sac surrounding the heart. This build-up of fluid around the heart is called pericardial effusion, and in our client’s case was related to an infection.
Our primary theory of negligence focused on multiple delays in evaluating our client after he arrived at the hospital. The most critical delay was the delay in performing an echocardiogram of the heart as soon as doctors suspected cardiac tamponade. An echocardiogram would have allowed a cardiologist to promptly confirm the presence of pericardial effusion and drain the fluid from around the heart. Instead, our client suffered a preventable cardiac arrest due to prolonged shock. Fortunately, our client was revived from his cardiac arrest. Though he would never be the same due to severe lack of oxygen to his brain. Our client underwent months of rehabilitation to re-learn how to speak, stand, and walk. Despite a miraculous recovery, our client was left with permanent cognitive and physical disabilities which deprived him of an independent life.
Our firm secured a $2 million settlement for an elderly man who suffered permanent quadriplegia due to delayed diagnosis and treatment of a spinal cord injury. Despite presenting to the emergency department with clear symptoms of spinal trauma, including pain, weakness, and neurological deficits, healthcare providers failed to promptly diagnose a cervical spine fracture and epidural hematoma. This delay in care resulted in the progression of the injury, leading to irreversible spinal cord compression and paralysis. Through vigorous litigation, we obtained justice for our client, holding the responsible parties accountable and providing the resources needed for his long-term care and support.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Under the doctrine of Ostensible Agency, a hospital can be held liable for the negligence of a doctor even if they aren’t technically an employee. If a reasonable patient would believe the doctor was an agent of the hospital (because they were wearing a hospital badge or treating you in the ER), the hospital is often responsible for that doctor’s errors.
Corporate negligence is a legal theory where the hospital is sued for its own failures, not just the mistakes of its employees. This includes failing to keep the building safe, hiring incompetent doctors, or failing to have enough nurses on duty. It holds the “entity” accountable for the systemic issues that led to your injury.
Yes. Hospitals are required to assess your fall risk. If they knew you were a risk but failed to provide assistance or use bed alarms, you can still recover damages. Pennsylvania uses a “Modified Comparative Negligence” rule, meaning as long as you were not more than 50% at fault, you can still win your case.
By itself, understaffing is a “Red Flag,” but to win a case, we must prove that the understaffing directly caused an injury. For example, if a nurse was busy with too many patients and failed to see an alarm indicating you were having a stroke, the understaffing is the “Breach” that caused the “Damages.”
Boarding is when a patient stays in the ER after being admitted because no hospital beds are open. This is dangerous because ERs are designed for “crisis” care, not “maintenance” care. If a patient’s condition worsens because the ER staff couldn’t provide the specialized monitoring of an ICU or a Med-Surg unit, the hospital is liable for that delay.
It means you are no longer “stuck” suing a hospital in a small county where they may be the largest employer and have significant influence. We can now permanently file cases in Allegheny County against any system that conducts business here, ensuring a more neutral and experienced jury.
The same rules of corporate negligence apply to outpatient surgical centers and clinics owned by these major systems. They have the same duty to vet their doctors and maintain safe equipment. If the center is owned by a corporate entity that “conducts business” in Pittsburgh, the 2026 venue rules still apply.
Because systemic errors often lead to catastrophic, multi-victim injuries, we pursue Economic Damages (medical costs, future care) and Non-Economic Damages (pain and suffering). In cases of “willful misconduct”—where a hospital knowingly ignored safety warnings to save money—we may also pursue Punitive Damages to punish the institution and prevent future harm.