Article:

Ascending Cholangitis

Free Case Evaluation

Fill out the form below to schedule a free evaluation.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

When Antibiotics Alone Are Not Enough

A night that families recognize:

A woman of 72 came to an emergency department at 9:15 at night. She had pain under her right ribs, a fever of 101.8, and shaking chills. Her blood work showed a bilirubin of 4.6 and an alkaline phosphatase of 380. An ultrasound found gallstones and a bile duct that was slightly widened.

She was given fluids and antibiotics, blood cultures were drawn, and she was admitted at 1:40 in the morning. By 7:00 her fever was gone and she told the nurse she felt better. A request for a gastroenterology consultation was entered at 10:20 a.m. The consultant saw her at 4:00 that afternoon.

At 9:00 that night her blood pressure dropped and she was moved to intensive care. Her ERCP was done the next afternoon. She died three days later.

The short answer

Ascending cholangitis is an infection trapped inside a blocked bile duct. Bile cannot drain out of the liver, bacteria multiply in it, and the infection is pushed into the bloodstream under pressure.

The failure that repeats in these cases is not a missed name. It is a missed decision. Antibiotics are started, the patient looks steadier for a while, and the blockage is never opened. The infection keeps arriving from a place antibiotics cannot clear.

There are two legal questions. Did the care fall below what a careful doctor or hospital would have done? And would opening the blockage sooner have changed how this ended?

The rest of this page explains how to tell what happened in your own case. It covers the tests, the timing, and the records that decide it. Our guide to severe abdominal pain emergencies covers the other conditions that get missed this way.

Gregory Unatin, Esq.

Contact Us for a Free, Confidential Consultation

Article written by Gregory Unatin, Esq. Greg is a managing partner in the law firm of Lupetin & Unatin, a medical malpractice law firm located in Pittsburgh and serving Western Pennsylvania.

Our practice is limited to high-value catastrophic cases because that is where we can do the most for our clients and for patient safety.

What a blocked and infected bile duct actually is

Your liver makes bile all day long. Bile leaves the liver through small tubes that join into one main tube. That tube is called the bile duct, and it empties into the intestine.

A gallstone can slip out of the gallbladder and lodge in that tube. Scar tissue from earlier surgery can narrow it. A stent placed months or years ago can clog. Whatever the cause, bile stops moving and starts backing up. Bacteria from the intestine live near the bottom of that tube, and they grow in the trapped bile.

Pressure builds behind the blockage. That pressure pushes bacteria into the small blood vessels of the liver, and from there into the bloodstream. This is why the infection does not settle down on its own. Antibiotics travel in the blood, and they do not reach far into stagnant bile behind a plug.

Why it gets missed

The pain sits under the right ribs. So does gallbladder pain, and so does a stomach ulcer. The ultrasound often shows gallstones, and that finding fits the more ordinary diagnosis just as well.

The condition doctors blame for the pain instead is usually acute cholecystitis, which is an inflamed gallbladder. That mistake is not careless. Cholecystitis is far more common, and it hurts in the same place. It causes fever and nausea too, and it is often treated with antibiotics and an operation that can wait a day or two. A doctor who assesses cholecystitis has landed somewhere reasonable. Other patients are told they have hepatitis, gastritis, or a stomach virus.

The textbook version of this infection is fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain together. Many patients never show all three. Older patients may have no fever at all and may look confused rather than sick.

Then comes the part that turns a delay into a death. Antibiotics work, at first. Fever drops. The heart rate settles. The patient says the pain is better and asks for something to eat. That improvement is real, and it is also misleading, because nothing has been unblocked.

So the plan stops moving. The chart says stable and improving, and the drainage procedure drifts to tomorrow. Sometimes it drifts across a weekend. Then the blood pressure falls, and it falls fast.

The test that should have been done

Three things point at this diagnosis, and each one has a limit worth knowing.

The blood work. A bilirubin that is climbing, along with a high alkaline phosphatase, says bile is not draining. In a patient with fever and abdominal pain, the lab results strongly point toward biliary obstruction. A high white blood cell count says infection. Together, these results suggest infected obstruction, which is a different problem from an inflamed gallbladder.

Blood cultures. A sample of blood is grown in the laboratory to identify the bacteria. Cultures drawn before antibiotics are the ones that matter most. A positive culture with intestinal bacteria, in a patient with these liver numbers, is strong evidence of what was happening.

Imaging of the duct. This is where cases are lost. A standard abdominal ultrasound is very good at seeing the gallbladder and the stones inside it. It is poor at seeing a stone in the bile duct itself, because bowel gas gets in the way. A radiologist can report a normal duct while a stone is lodged in it.

That distinction is often the whole case. An MRCP is an MRI aimed specifically at the bile ducts, and it is a different study from a routine MRI of the abdomen. An endoscopic ultrasound puts the probe inside the stomach, inches from the duct. Both see what a scan through the belly wall cannot.

So here is the direct answer to the question families ask most. A normal ultrasound does not rule this out. Neither does a duct described as normal in size, because a duct can be blocked before it widens. When the blood work and the fever say infected obstruction, a reassuring ultrasound is a reason to look harder.

The clock

Antibiotics do not open a blockage. That single fact drives the timing of everything else.

While the duct stays plugged, pressure keeps forcing bacteria into the blood. The kidneys begin to fail. Blood pressure drops and stops responding to fluids. Clotting goes wrong and confusion sets in. Once blood pressure needs medication to hold it up, organs are already being injured.

Septic shock can develop within a day of arrival. In some patients it comes faster, and it can come while the chart still reads stable.

The fix is mechanical. The usual method is ERCP, done through the mouth with a flexible scope and no incision. The endoscopist reaches the bottom of the bile duct. The stone comes out, or a small tube called a stent goes in, and the trapped bile drains. Patients often improve within hours of that happening.

How fast it needs to happen depends on how sick the patient is. A patient whose blood pressure is already failing needs drainage urgently, not on the next opening on the OR schedule. A patient who is sick but holding steady still needs it soon. Soon means during the same admission, not a plan to see how the week goes. That is the heart of these cases. The blocked duct should have been drained once the blood work showed an infected blockage.  Timely drainage provides the essential source control needed to halt the progression toward irreversible septic shock

If no endoscopist is available, there are other ways in. A radiologist can place a drain through the skin into the liver. A surgeon can open the duct. A patient can be transferred to a hospital with a doctor who does ERCP at night. Whether any of that was considered, and what the chart says about it, is often the most important question in the case.

Who is at highest risk

  • Known gallstones, especially in someone who has had attacks of pain before.
  • A bile duct that was operated on, narrowed by scar, or has a stent in it.
  • Older age, because the usual warning signs are often muted.
  • Diabetes, which blunts the response to infection and predicts a worse course.
  • A weakened immune system, from chemotherapy, transplant medication, or steroids.

Any of these should raise the level of concern rather than lower it. Our article on severe abdominal pain covers the broader risk factors across these emergencies.

What to look for in the records

These are things you can check yourself, or ask a lawyer to check.

  • The first blood work, including the bilirubin and the alkaline phosphatase, and the time it was drawn.
  • Whether blood cultures were drawn before antibiotics, and when they came back positive.
  • Who was told about the positive culture, and at what time.
  • The vital sign flowsheet, looking for fever, a fast heart rate, a falling blood pressure, or a temperature below normal.
  • The ultrasound or CT report, and whether it describes a widened duct or a stone inside it.
  • Whether any better look at the duct was ordered, such as an MRCP or an endoscopic ultrasound.
  • The time a gastroenterology consultation was requested, and the time the consultant appeared.
  • The time the drainage procedure was requested, and the time it was performed.
  • Whether anyone wrote down a reason for the gap between those two times.
  • Whether transfer to another hospital was raised, and what was said about it.

Several of these together do not prove a case, and a single missing item does not rule one out.

What none of this proves

The defense in these cases is not weak, and you should hear it first.

Many patients with this infection do get better on antibiotics and fluids while they wait for a scheduled procedure. Deciding when to drain is a judgment call. Part of that clinical judgment is whether the patient can tolerate sedation, and an ERCP in a patient with falling blood pressure carries real risk. A defense expert will say the team was watching closely, the patient was improving, and the procedure was booked at a reasonable time. Sometimes that is true.

So the two questions stay open. Did the care fall below what a careful doctor or hospital would have done in the same situation? And would earlier drainage have changed the outcome?

The argument in a case like this is not that the diagnosis was obvious. It is narrower. It is that findings were already in this chart, at a specific hour, that called for the duct to be opened. It was not opened. The gap between them is either explained in the chart or it is not.

How people die from this, and what happens to those who survive

Most people with a blocked and infected bile duct are drained in time, and they recover and go home.

When it goes the other way, it usually goes one of three ways. The most common is septic shock with multiple organ failure. Blood pressure stops responding, the kidneys shut down, and the body cannot be supported. The second is sudden collapse, sometimes cardiac arrest, during the crash that follows a period of apparent stability. The third is death after drainage finally happens, when the infection is controlled but the organs are already too damaged.

Among those who survive, the injuries that permanently change a life are these, most common first.

  • Kidney failure that does not recover, leaving the person on dialysis three days a week for life.
  • Lung injury that keeps a person on a ventilator for weeks, often ending in a tracheostomy and long-term care.
  • Brain injury from cardiac arrest or prolonged low blood pressure, ranging from memory problems to total dependence.
  • Scarring of the bile duct itself, which can mean repeated procedures for years and eventual liver damage.
  • Loss of fingers, toes, or limbs from the medications used to hold blood pressure up. This one is uncommon.

How we prove a case like this

A handful of records decide this condition, and they are usually short documents.

The timed liver and bile duct laboratory values establish that an obstruction was known about, and when. The blood culture result and the notification record establish that infection in the bloodstream was known about, and when. The times the drainage procedure was requested and performed establish the gap. The consultation requests to gastroenterology, and the times the consultants responded, show where the delay happened and who owned it.

Cases like this usually need more than one expert. Depending on where the delay occurred, that can mean emergency medicine, gastroenterology, infectious disease, critical care, and hospital medicine.

Pennsylvania also requires a licensed professional to certify that the care fell below the accepted standard before a case can move forward. That is not a formality. The medicine gets reviewed by a qualified physician before anything is filed. Learn about the full investigation process.

Frequently Asked Questions

Because antibiotics treat the infection in the blood, not the blockage that keeps producing it. The bile behind the stone is trapped, and the drug does not get in there in useful amounts. Antibiotics can slow that and buy time, which is why patients often look better for a while. They cannot end it, and the improvement they cause is a main reason drainage gets postponed.

Sometimes it is. The honest version of that argument is that a patient in shock needs resuscitation first, so she can tolerate sedation. The problem is that the same argument gets made about a patient who was stable the day before. She could have had the procedure easily then, and she became unstable because of the wait. We look at what the vital signs were earlier and what was documented as the reason for waiting.

No. Getting a complete hospital chart is harder than most people expect, and partial records are common. Discharge summaries and death certificates leave out the timed laboratory values and procedure times that decide these cases. We request the full chart ourselves, including nursing notes and flowsheets. If you already have records, bring them, but do not wait on them.

No. An initial conversation is free, and so is our review of the case. We work on a contingency basis, which means a fee only if we recover money for you. Many of the people who call us want to know what happened more than they want to file a lawsuit.

In Pennsylvania, a medical malpractice lawsuit must be filed in a proper court within two years of the date of death or in the absence of death, the date when the patient knew or should have known they suffered an injury which may have been related to health care.

The practical point is that these cases turn on witness memory and on records that get harder to obtain over time. Physicians and nurses move to other hospitals. Waiting costs you something even when no deadline is close.

What to do now

Gather what you already have: discharge paperwork, the death certificate if there is one, the hospital names and the dates. Then write down what you remember while it is fresh, especially times. What time you arrived. When somebody first said the word cholangitis, or blockage. When you asked about the procedure, and what you were told. Those details are often not in the chart and they matter. Then call us, or start with our guide to severe abdominal pain emergencies if you want to understand the medicine first.

This article is provided for general informational purposes and is not legal or medical advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different. If you have questions about your own situation, speak with a qualified attorney.

What can we help you find?

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors